On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@xxxxxx> wrote:
> +static void cleanup_children(int sig)
> +{
> + while (children_to_clean) {
> + struct child_to_clean *p = children_to_clean;
> + children_to_clean = p->next;
> + kill(p->pid, sig);
> + free(p);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup_children_on_signal(int sig)
> +{
> + cleanup_children(sig);
> + sigchain_pop(sig);
> + raise(sig);
> +}
> +
Our Windows implementation of kill (mingw_kill in compat/mingw.c) only
supports SIGKILL, so propagating other signals to child-processes will
fail with EINVAL. That being said, Windows' support for signals is
severely limited, but I'm not entirely sure which ones can be
generated in this case.
> @@ -312,6 +375,7 @@ fail_pipe:
> cmd->pid = -1;
> }
> close(notify_pipe[0]);
> +
> }
> #else
> {
This hunk is probably unintentional...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html