Re: [PATCH 0/3] More on pulling signed tags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> ... and this is a fix-up patch on top of the series. With this, the output
> becomes like this:

Looking good, this is very useful. The hacks to extract the signatures
with 'git cat-file' were pretty ugly.

This is also nice for the case where the person doing the merge
doesn't yet have the pgp key something was signed with, so when you do
the "git pull", you get the "unknown key" thing instead of a "good
signature" message in the editor buffer.

It *used* to be the case that you had to abort the merge, fetch the
key, and re-pull in order to verify the key.

Now you can just say "ok, I'll commit the merge" and finish up, then
fetch the key, do "git show --show-signature", and if it doesn't show
up as good (which would be very rare) you can then 'git reset'
instead.  Which while less anal, is a lot more convenient.

                    Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]