Re: [PATCH] remote-curl: don't pass back fake refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:28:09PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Do you want to squash in those tests, or should I re-send with a commit
> > message more fully explaining the situation?
> 
> I was lazy and added these three lines at the end:
> 
>     This also fixes pushing with --mirror to a smart-http remote that uses
>     alternates. The fake ".have" refs the server gives to avoid unnecessary
>     network transfer has a similar bad interactions with the machinery.
> 
> but it may warrant a more thorough write-up there.

I think that's probably enough. I could restructure the whole text to
talk less about capabilities^{} and more about generically preventing
fake refs, but I really don't think there's much point.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]