Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:28:14AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > Perhaps we should squash in the test below, which demonstrates the
>> > breakage. I also wonder if this is maint-worthy.
>>
>> Thanks for a thorough analysis. I agree that this should go to maint even
>> more so, as it fixes a case to push to a non-empty repository.
>
> Do you want to squash in those tests, or should I re-send with a commit
> message more fully explaining the situation?
I was lazy and added these three lines at the end:
This also fixes pushing with --mirror to a smart-http remote that uses
alternates. The fake ".have" refs the server gives to avoid unnecessary
network transfer has a similar bad interactions with the machinery.
but it may warrant a more thorough write-up there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html