Re: [PATCH 04/15] t1007 (hash-object): fix && chaining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>

I think there's room for at least one line of description about why
one would want to do this.

IMHO if the patches are only being sent to me, Junio, and the
mailing list (and not cc-ed to different people), then there's no
reason to split them up when they have the same topic.

Aside from that, patches 1-3 look good.  Now for this one:

[...]
> --- a/t/t1007-hash-object.sh
> +++ b/t/t1007-hash-object.sh
> @@ -154,13 +154,13 @@ test_expect_success 'check that --no-filters option works with --stdin-paths' '
>  pop_repo
>  
>  for args in "-w --stdin" "--stdin -w"; do
> -	push_repo
> +	push_repo &&
>  
>  	test_expect_success "hash from stdin and write to database ($args)" '
>  		test $example_sha1 = $(git hash-object $args < example)
> -	'
> +	' &&

I don't see how this would have any effect.  Is it intended?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]