&&-chaining tester

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

> Missing the chaining '&&' seems to be quite a common
> error: I vaguely remember seeing a patch to detect this sometime ago.
> Jonathan?

I guess you mean [1].

If you want to deploy it, you have three choices:

 - maintain a list of tests known to have broken &&-chaining, and
   set GIT_SKIP_TESTS to avoid them

 - fix all cases of broken &&-chaining.  For extra bonus points,
   send out those patches, respond to reviews, and gently usher
   them into Junio's tree

 - modify the &&-chaining tester to output a list of tests encountered
   with broken &&-chaining instead of halting on the first one.

Some day, I'd like to (help) carry out option (b), but please don't
hold your breath.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/157903/focus=158265
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]