Re: [PATCH] cvs-migration document: make the need for "push" more obvious

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



J. Bruce Fields wrote:
We should start out with the assumption that a shared repo is already
set up and make it:

	committing to a shared repository
	creating a shared repository
	importing a cvs archive

which puts it in stuff-most-people-need-to-know to
stuff-less-people-need-to-know order.  Maybe the current introduction
should even be postponed to later.

Yes, definitely!

I'm not complaining about changing to git, but Dscho's comment really rings true:

> A developer, especially those whom Git is forced upon, have an
> attention span shorter than their pub1c hair.

I'm in the middle of exam period, I have a term papers to write, and I have two weeks of lilypond bug reports and doc typos to process. I don't care if git can do branches really nicely or walk my dog or cure cancer. I can look at that stuff later -- right now I just want to fix things and upload them.

Cheers,
- Graham
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]