Re: [PATCH] cvs-migration document: make the need for "push" more obvious

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 03:52:26PM +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin escreveu:
> > It really is an important concept to grasp for people coming
> > from CVS. Even if it is briefly mentioned, it is not obvious
> > enough to sink in.
> 
> I think the goal is laudable, but IMO it would be better to shorten
> the document rather adding more text.

OK, but...

>  Documentation/cvs-migration.txt |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

... that lengthens it even more than the proposed addition.

> +    Hence, there is a difference between creating a revision
> +    (the "commit" command) and submitting it (the "push" command).

I'd rather leave that introduction as it is--just as a section that
advertises the git features without trying to explain much.  And I'd
rather not mention push until we have a chance to explain how to use it.

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]