Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Because all blobs in this tree object must be in a fixed order, and >> they won't likely have meaningful names nor permission, should >> CAT_TREE payload is a SHA-1 sequence of all blobs (or cat-trees if we >> want nested trees) instead? IOW the tree is integrated into cat-tree >> object, not as a separate tree object. > > I have no problem with that (I am not worried about minor details of the > actual implementation of cat-tree yet). Side note. It should be renamed "split-object" or something if we go the route you suggest, as "tree"-ness of the actual representation is not essential. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html