Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Because all blobs in this tree object must be in a fixed order, and > they won't likely have meaningful names nor permission, should > CAT_TREE payload is a SHA-1 sequence of all blobs (or cat-trees if we > want nested trees) instead? IOW the tree is integrated into cat-tree > object, not as a separate tree object. I have no problem with that (I am not worried about minor details of the actual implementation of cat-tree yet). > Not sure if it's related to representation types, but is there any way > (perhaps FLAT_BLOB type?) we can mark an object uncompressed, so we > can mmap() and access it directly? In pack? Loose? Both? What kind of payload and use case do you have in mind? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html