Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/2] is_url: Remove redundant assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  url.c |    1 -
>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/url.c b/url.c
>> index 3e06fd3..d2e17e6 100644
>> --- a/url.c
>> +++ b/url.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ int is_url(const char *url)
>>
>>        if (!url)
>>                return 0;
>> -       url2 = url;
>>        first_slash = strchr(url, '/');
>>
>>        /* Input with no slash at all or slash first can't be URL. */
>
> Looks correct. Perhaps you could mention in the patch message that
>
>   There are no operations on url2 until another assignment to it later
> at line 41.

The looks correct, so I'll queue it, but it looks like that the function
is implemented in an overly complicated way.

Why aren't we checking from left to right in a single pass, perhaps like
this?

	/* Make sure it is of form "scheme://something" */
	int is_url(const char *url)
	{
		/* Is "scheme" part reasonable? */
		if (!url || !is_urlschemechar(1, *url++))
	        	return 0;
		while (*url && *url != ':') {
			if (!is_urlschemechar(0, *url++))
				return 0;
		}
		/* We've seen "scheme"; we want colon-slash-slash */
		return (url[0] == ':' && url[1] == '/' && url[2] == '/');
	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]