Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Improved infrastructure for refname normalization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> OTOH I am again having serious doubts that trying to support
> unnormalized refnames is a good idea.

Sorry, I am confused. I thought the way you are planning forward is to
leave unnormalized ones unchecked as the current code does (and mark the
places that do so with _unsafe()), with the eventual goal of fixing the
caller to pass only normalized ones to make call to the "safe" version?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]