Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Improved infrastructure for refname normalization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Patch series re-roll:

Thanks for working on this. I very much like the general direction of the
series, the strategy to avoid wholesale audit of the callers and marking
the places that needs fixing with "_unsafe()".

There were a few minor things that looked worth mentioning while
reviewing, though.

 - (style) You seem to be fond of pre-increment a lot, but in general our
   codebase prefers post-increment especially when the end result does not
   make any difference, e.g.

	for (i = 1; ...; ++i) {
        	...

 - (series structure) It might make the series progress easier to follow
   if you introduced check_ref_format_unsafe() in the same commit where
   you change check_ref_format() to take flags parameter.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]