On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:01:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@xxxxxx> writes: > > > Commit 90a6c7d4 (propagate --quiet to send-pack/receive-pack) > > introduced the --quiet option to receive-pack and made send-pack > > pass that option. Older versions of receive-pack do not recognize > > the option, however, and terminate immediately. > > > > This change restores backwards compatibility by adding a 'quiet' > > capability to receive-pack. > > Wouldn't this mean that there is no point in adding --quiet command line > option to the receive-pack command? IOW, shouldn't parts of 90a6c7d > (propagate --quiet to send-pack/receive-pack, 2011-07-30) be reverted? > > At this late stage in the release cycle, I would rather prefer to revert > the whole commit and leave anything new for the next cycle. Sure, we can do that. Only then 1.7.6.1 will be broken against all versions except 1.7.6.1 on the server side. Right now it is only broken against 1.7.6 and older versions. But I am ok with it either way. I will have to check how much resolving needs to be done after the revert. Clemens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html