Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@xxxxxx> writes: > Commit 90a6c7d4 (propagate --quiet to send-pack/receive-pack) > introduced the --quiet option to receive-pack and made send-pack > pass that option. Older versions of receive-pack do not recognize > the option, however, and terminate immediately. > > This change restores backwards compatibility by adding a 'quiet' > capability to receive-pack. Wouldn't this mean that there is no point in adding --quiet command line option to the receive-pack command? IOW, shouldn't parts of 90a6c7d (propagate --quiet to send-pack/receive-pack, 2011-07-30) be reverted? At this late stage in the release cycle, I would rather prefer to revert the whole commit and leave anything new for the next cycle. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html