On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 01:53:42PM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > Sure. I'm totally open to the idea of making the non-fast-forward > > warning more obvious. Suggestions for wording (though I am tempted by > > "HEY STUPID" above ;) )? > > I'm not suggesting all non-fast-forward should issue a bigger warning. > pu updates daily with a non-fast-forward. That isn't useful. > > But if the local reflog hints that this reference almost never does a > non-fast-forward, and then it does, that should be a big warning. Right. What I mean is, what should the bigger warning look like? Also, you suggested caching to avoid looking through the whole reflog each time. I think you could probably just sample the last 10 or so reflog entries to get an idea. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html