Re: Dropping '+' from fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:42:49AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:

> >     It would be considerably nicer if the server had some way of saying
> >     "I expect this branch to be rewound". Which has been discussed off
> >     and on over the years, as I recall.
> 
> Hmm, that sounds like the often requested feature to have part of the
> config distributed by "clone" as well, possibly after displaying it and
> getting user confirmation.

Yeah, if distributed config existed, that would be a good place to put
this information.

And I personally thing a limited form[1] of distributed config is a
sensible idea, but I'm not sure everybody else agrees.

-Peff

[1] My idea of "limited" would be an allow-known-good list of harmless
config keys which we would respect when they came from the remote, with
the option for the user to whitelist or blacklist more keys if they
wanted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]