Re: Malformed branch name in fast-export when specifying non-HEAD/branch revision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 02:27:00PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Yeah, the behavior of your patch looks fine to me. I thought the point
> > in contention was that having export understand refspecs would fix a lot
> > of _other_ cases, too.
> 
> Perhaps if we added refspecs we could cover other cases, too, but I do not
> think we need to require the patch to cover additional cases. The more
> problematic was that the particular implementation in the patch smelled
> bad.

OK. I didn't look at that at all. I just wanted to express my support
for "refspecs would solve other problems, too". :)

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]