Re: Malformed branch name in fast-export when specifying non-HEAD/branch revision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Yeah, the behavior of your patch looks fine to me. I thought the point
> in contention was that having export understand refspecs would fix a lot
> of _other_ cases, too.

Perhaps if we added refspecs we could cover other cases, too, but I do not
think we need to require the patch to cover additional cases. The more
problematic was that the particular implementation in the patch smelled
bad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]