Hi, On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 01:37:53PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:28:31AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > We have been talking about loose submodules for some time: > >> > >> Also before introducing a new terminology "loose submodule", please define > >> it somewhere. It feels confusing to me that a normal submodule, which > >> shouldn't be auto-cloned nor auto-updated without "submodule init", needs > >> to be called by a name other than simply a "submodule" but with an > >> adjuctive "loose submodule". > > > > Thats why I avoided talking about it in the docs. For the commit message > > I thought it would be kind of intuitive but I can update the commit > > message so that it becomes more clear. > > That sounds like a good thing to do. I discovered that I only talked in the cover letter about the term 'loose'. Since that will not go into any commit I guess we can keep the series this way? Cheers Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html