Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add an update=none option for 'loose' submodules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> If a submodule is used to seperate some bigger parts of a project into
> an optional directory it is helpful to not clone/update them by default.

Sorry if I am slow, but I do not get this.

I thought unless you say "submodule init" once, a submodule you are not
interested in should not be cloned nor updated at all. If that is not the
case, isn't it a bug to be fixed without a new configuration variable that
fixes it only when it is set?

> We have been talking about loose submodules for some time:

Also before introducing a new terminology "loose submodule", please define
it somewhere. It feels confusing to me that a normal submodule, which
shouldn't be auto-cloned nor auto-updated without "submodule init", needs
to be called by a name other than simply a "submodule" but with an
adjuctive "loose submodule".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]