On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:16:27PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > http://raflabs.com/blogs/silence-is-foo/2011/04/07/staging-area-index-cache-git/ > > > > I thought it made some good points about git being kinda confusing, > > for example sentences like "Changed but not updated" in git status > > could use a better sentence like "Changed but not in the index". > > Sounds reasonable (well, with some more precise wording to reflect > that this means "changed but not all changes are reflected in the > index"). Didn't we fix this already in 8009d83 (Better "Changed but not updated" message in git-status, 2010-11-02)? Since v1.7.4, "git status" has "Changes not staged for commit". -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html