Re: [PATCH 5/6] sequencer: Expose API to cherry-picking machinery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Another thought.  I wonder if it's possible to leave
> sequencer_parse_args() private to builtin/revert.c, making the split
> a little more logical:
>
>  - the builtin takes responsibility for its commandline interface
>  - the library takes over once the builtin has figured out what the
>    user wanted.

That's a very natural separation of tasks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]