Re: git blame

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Carl Worth wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here's a crazy idea. How about a "git tutorial" builtin or "git example" 
>>>> or something that would create a repository into some useful state for 
>>>> demonstrating something.
>>>
>>> That sounds fine! Actually, it should be very simple to turn the tutorial 
>>> into such a script, displaying the command with an explanation, and 
>>> executing the command. It could even call gitk from time to time, so the 
>>> user can form a mental model of the ancestor graph.
>> 
>> Doesn't one of our existing t/ scripts do that?
> 
> ;-) I did not forget... t1200-tutorial.sh
> 
> But it serves a different purpose: it makes sure that we did not break the 
> commands in the tutorial. (I fear that the script and the tutorial have 
> diverged a little bit, though).
> 
> git-tutorial should not test that, rather it should show the user what is 
> possible, and encourage playing with git.

Something like Cogito tutorial-script?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]