Re: git blame

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Carl Worth wrote:
> >
> >> Here's a crazy idea. How about a "git tutorial" builtin or "git example" 
> >> or something that would create a repository into some useful state for 
> >> demonstrating something.
> >
> > That sounds fine! Actually, it should be very simple to turn the tutorial 
> > into such a script, displaying the command with an explanation, and 
> > executing the command. It could even call gitk from time to time, so the 
> > user can form a mental model of the ancestor graph.
> 
> Doesn't one of our existing t/ scripts do that?

;-) I did not forget... t1200-tutorial.sh

But it serves a different purpose: it makes sure that we did not break the 
commands in the tutorial. (I fear that the script and the tutorial have 
diverged a little bit, though).

git-tutorial should not test that, rather it should show the user what is 
possible, and encourage playing with git.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]