Heya, On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 20:27, Jon Forrest <nobozo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I entirely agree. My point is only that the various tests > that expect the current behavior will have to be changed > whether the implementation of correct plurals uses my > inferior method or the way more correct i18n method. Wouldn't it be a nice hack if we just solved problem through i18n then? Have all the plumbing see the current wording, but through i18n change it to something grammatically correct for the porcelain. Probably not possible, but a nice daydream :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html