Re: [PATCH 17/18] revert: Don't implictly stomp pending sequencer operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Sure, if the advice is quiet (as it is in this case), I suppose there
> is no need to guard it until someone using it complains. :)
>
> I mentioned advice configuration to emphasize that output from running
> git with all "hint:" lines stripped out is supposed to be just as
> sensible as with them, if I understand the purpose of the facility
> correctly.

Ah, I hadn't thought about this so deeply.  Indeed a standalone
"error: Could not create sequencer directory '.git/sequencer'." does
not make much sense to the end user.  Now fix so that the caller
reports the error.
Thanks.

-- Ram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]