Re: [RFC/PATCHv2 1/6] decorate: allow storing values instead of pointers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Doing macro meta-programming like this makes me feel a little dirty, but
> I actually think the result is more readable.
>
>   [1/3]: implement generic key/value map
>   [2/3]: fast-export: use object to uint32 map instead of "decorate"
>   [3/3]: decorate: use "map" for the underlying implementation
>
> What do you think?

Yeah, dirty but nice ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]