Am 5/25/2011 11:36, schrieb Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason: > Aren't you confusing ab/i18n-scripts-basic with ab/i18n-scripts? No, I'm aware of the difference and purposes of the two topics. >> ... if there were a NO_GETTEXT switch that simply avoids all >> the problems on Windows. Is there such a switch? > > There isn't and can't be without major re-organizations because > shellscripts don't have something like the C preprocessor. Well, we do preprocess the shell scripts. Wouldn't it be a matter of if test -z '@@NO_GETTEXT@@' then ... regular eval_gettext definition ... else ... dummy eval_gettext definition ... fi with a corresponding extension of the sed script in the Makefile? > But I'll just fix the Windows issue soon and submit a new series for > inclusion in next. Thanks! I just wanted to be sure that ab/i18n-scripts does not end up in master in a state that leaves Windows in limbo. -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html