Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2011, #11; Tue, 24)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 08:25, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 5/24/2011 23:45, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> * ab/i18n-scripts (2011-05-21) 48 commits
>> Â (merged to 'next' on 2011-05-23 at 69164a3)
>> Â...
>>
>> Rerolled.
>
> I see you promoted ab/i18n-scripts-basic to master. What are your plans
> with this topic? In its current form, git-submodule breaks in an obvious
> way on Windows, and other pitfalls may hide elsewhere.

Aren't you confusing ab/i18n-scripts-basic with ab/i18n-scripts? The
former just adds the infrastructure, the latter adds some eval_gettext
invocations that break on Windows while I haven't submitted some fixup
patches for what's now in *next*, not master.

If anything's breaking on Windows in master it would be the
t/t0201-gettext-fallbacks.sh test which uses some eval_gettext()
calls, but nothing else uses it currently.

> I don't have enough energy to help out with this issue, particularly
> because i18n is not exactly my own itch. Personally, I wouldn't mind the
> fate of the topic if there were a NO_GETTEXT switch that simply avoids all
> the problems on Windows. Is there such a switch?

There isn't and can't be without major re-organizations because
shellscripts don't have something like the C preprocessor.

But I'll just fix the Windows issue soon and submit a new series for
inclusion in next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]