Re: [PATCH 0/8] Sequencer Foundations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Christian Couder wrote:

>> I think that the risk at this point might be to overengineer things
>> and to lose time, and then we will perhaps find out that we need to do
>> some refactoring of the merge_recursive API anyway.
>
> I agree with the general principle... let's see if I understand the
> details of what you are saying.

It occurs to me now that you were probably talking about the
suggestion of using the lockfile API (i.e., the write temporary/rename
trick).  In that case, I agree --- no need to overengineer it and
concurrency problems can be fixed later.  Sorry for an overcomplicated
explanation.

And thanks for looking out for these things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]