Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests: eliminate unnecessary setup test assertions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I think multiple -L is not quite enough. I want a single "-L" that
> matches every instance of a pattern, like:
>
>   -L "/ ()/,+0"

Of course I am aware that needs to be a part of the multiple -L topic;
after all I was the one who invented -L "$regexp" support ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]