Re: [RFC] require-work-tree wants more than what its name says

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Heya,

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 04:11, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Â- I am not sure if git-submodule.sh correctly works with the "as long as
> Â there is a working tree somewhere, it is OK" semantics. ÂIt may have
> Â to stay "require_work_tree" to ensure that the $cwd is within the
> Â working tree.

So do we need more tests for git-submodule to find out, or is this a
hint to the submodule people to chime in? If so, should they be cc-ed?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]