Re: [RFC] require-work-tree wants more than what its name says

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 08:42:58AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > ... but I worry about compatibility. We can audit our in-tree scripts,
> > but git-sh-setup is part of the recommended API for external scripts,
> > no?
> 
> I am Ok with renaming the thing to "require_work_tree_exists", and all the
> worry will go away.

Yeah, that seems like a fine solution to me.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]