Re: [REGRESSION] git-wrapper to run-commands codepath regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> With ebec842 (run-command: prettify -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE workaround,
> 2011-03-16) reverted, I still don't get complaints from -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
> for run-command.c (but I do get "ignoring return value of 'fwrite' from
> many places).  Perhaps the kinds of checks done by versions of gcc you,
> Jonathan and I use are different.

It's not about fortify warnings, but "set but not used" warnings.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]