Re: [REGRESSION] git-wrapper to run-commands codepath regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> And here's the fix.

I was tempted to suggest the change in your patch.

With ebec842 (run-command: prettify -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE workaround,
2011-03-16) reverted, I still don't get complaints from -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
for run-command.c (but I do get "ignoring return value of 'fwrite' from
many places).  Perhaps the kinds of checks done by versions of gcc you,
Jonathan and I use are different.

I'd rather revert it for now; I don't want to see patch ping-pong at this
late in the pre-release cycle.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]