Re: [PATCHv2] doc: Clarify that "cherry-pick -x" does not use "git notes"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> How can this be not true anymore? If you get a conflict while picking,
> you're asked to resolve the conflict and then commit via "git commit
> -c <picked_sha1>". Doing so will *not* give you the mentioned "(cherry
> picked from commit ...)" line.

I suspect Jay had the recent CHERRY_PICK_HEAD series that lets you omit
saying "-c <picked>" in mind.  We should not leave the cherry-picked from
in such a case, I think, but the new code may be buggy.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]