Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/7] i18n: mark missing C messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason  <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> This is an RFC because the first patch still leaves one remaining
> gitdir test failing under GETTEXT_POISON, and I won't be able to find
> out why tonight. Help welcome with figuring out why (in which case
> this should all be OK), you just need too build with
> GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease and run t/t0001-init.sh.

I didn't even compile test this one, but I highly suspect that all the
failures you saw come from the fact that .git file your patch produces
with gettext poisoning (or any l10n) would be malformed and cannot be
parsed by read_gitfile_gently() anymore.

I took a look at the remainder of the series, and except for the "do not
call what you know is a singleton 'them'" grammo, everything looked fine
to me.

I am tempted to merge them to 'master' before rc2; the alternative is to
queue it on ab/i18n-fixup and keep it in 'next' until the 1.7.5 final, and
have other people build on top of ab/i18n-fixup topic.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]