Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] strbuf: make sure buffer is zero-terminated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:54:17PM +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
>
>> strbuf_init does not zero-terminate the initial buffer when hint is
>> non-zero. Fix this so strbuf_attach does not return garbage.
>
> s/attach/detach/ I think.

Indeed, thanks for catching it.

> It is more than just detach, though; the
> NUL-termination is supposed to be an invariant of strbuf, so any code
> just looking at "sb.buf" would be broken. So your code looks fine, but
> you may want to mention that in the commit message.
>

You're right. How about something like this instead?

strbuf_init does not zero-terminate the initial buffer when hint is
non-zero. Fix this so we can rely on the string to be zero-terminated
even if we haven't filled it with anything yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]