Re: GSOC idea: build in scripts and cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:55:22AM +0200, Robert David wrote:
> 
> > > As far as cleanup versus features, I think Thomas would have to comment
> > > on that. He is the one who did the most work on patch-mode, and
> > > therefore the one who most thinks it needs cleaned up. :)
> > 
> > Is Thomas going to be a mentor in this task?
> 
> I hope so. I can also co-mentor if it helps.

I'm certainly ready; I didn't propose any projects that I would not
also mentor.  (However, I won't mentor more than one...)

Note that while it's certainly a bonus, porting it to C probably makes
the project more difficult and time-consuming.  We'll have to see in
the proposal timelines however.

As for cleanup, my gut feeling right now is that the Perl code can
probably cope with incremental cleanups as required for each feature.
On the other hand, the C port should start from a clean redesign so as
to not rewrite it twice.

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]