On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 09:48:34PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> This issue is not introduced by your patch, but maybe it is a good > >> opportunity to refactor this to use expand_notes_ref from notes.c? > > > > Oops, I just realized this is in builtin/notes.c in master. I had > > already written a patch for another topic that made it globally > > accessible. :) > > Yeah, I (figured and) factored it out myself meanwhile, and rebased. I'm > wondering though where we are going. Junio seems to be in a mood for > major changes to the notes ui, so maybe I should hold on until we > decided about a ui restructuring. I have a series I'll send in a few minutes. It _would_ be a lot cleaner if we just dropped --show-notes and company entirely, but I think that is perhaps too aggressive, even for such a young feature. > I think, though, that any notes ui revamp is correlated with our > (stalled?) discussions about the layout of refs/. It affects not only > the default notes ref ("commits" for all notes?) but also the question > what a standard notes ref is, and where to store (and how to specify) > upstream notes refs. Yeah, I think those are open questions. But we can probably get away with at least this option refactoring without having to answer them. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html