Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
> For this particular one, there is no need for version 2.

Actually, I think it is both true and untrue. True, because we need some
indicator that we trust packed-refs file to provide tag dereferences to
distinguish between the case when there are no tag objects at all, so there
are no tag dereferences in packed-refs, and the situation where we use
packed-refs generated by older git, and there are no tag dereferences in
packed-refs because git didn't saved it.


We should be able to handle the ambiguous/malformed lines correctly
and gracefully _always_, without 'trust' a version number to avoid to
be prone to attacks with a malicious malformed file.

Anyway document versioning it's a common and savy practice.


Marco
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]