Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Suggestions?

Other than not doing the remove way before the code knows that it is
necessary to get rid of the path because there needs to be a directory?
No.

Personally, I've long given up on d/f conflict codepath in merge-recursive
as unsalvageable, short of a total rewrite.  As I said in the other
message, the patch you sent in is a good enough fix within the context of
the current code.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]