Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] t6022: New test checking for unnecessary updates of renamed+modified files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 3/1/2011 2:08, schrieb Elijah Newren:
> Use
> Â Â Â Âtest-chmtime =1000000000 rename &&
<snip>
> Â Â Â Âorig=$(test-chmtime -v +0 rename) &&
<snip>
>> + Â Â git diff-files --exit-code # Is "rename" clean, or only racily clean?
>
> What you see here, is not "racily clean", but "stat dirty". "Racily clean"
> means that git thinks that the file is clean (because the stat information
> matches), but in fact the file content is not identical to the content
> recorded in the index.

Thanks for the suggestions and explanation; I've got it and Jeff's
suggestions incorporated.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]