Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> writes: > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Marco Costalba wrote: >>> >>> Tested also with show-ref only, not useful to me, but just as a comparison. >>> >>> - git tree 1420ms >>> - linux tree 1021ms >>> >>> Better, but still slower then what I would expected. >> >> MUCH slower than expected. There is something seriously wrong about Marco's number with or without my patch. I am getting something like this from linux-2.6 with fully packed and pruned refs; $ /usr/bin/time git-show-ref -d >/dev/null 0.08user 0.00system 0:00.08elapsed 97%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+3314minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ /usr/bin/time ../git.junio/git-show-ref -d >/dev/null 0.05user 0.01system 0:00.06elapsed 98%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+2724minor)pagefaults 0swaps The second one is with the patch, the first one is from yesterday's master. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html