Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It is probably unlikely to see a SP in the pathname, but I do not think it > is reasonable to introduce a regression to forbid '=' in the pathname to > the repository, which we have been supporting since August 2009, when we > know the patch as-is will regress the use case, and especially when we > already know a way to code not to regress is not too complex. Even though I don't deeply care about what CVSNT does, but I am somewhat curious why this "change SP to =" was done when CVSNT writes out its $HOME/.cvs/cvspass file. Does anybody know why? Only to make things incompatible, perhaps? ;-) http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2009-April/025095.html seems to indicate that somebody next door had a similar experience on exactly the same issue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html