Re: configuring cherry-pick to always use -x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Michael J Gruber
<git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> - If you do want them on the same branch "f-release", you probably know
> beforehand which commits you don't want on master. You can fake-merge
> these ("merge -Xours") to master and merge the others, which is somewhat
> ugly but still better than cherry-picking everything. In some sense this
> is "manual rerere" whose results are shared (pushed) easily.(*)

I personally prefer cherry-pick, as the fake merge clutters mainline's
history with the superseded commits.

It would be interesting to have a history simplification that given a
merge M of parents A and B, ignored commits $(merge-base A B)..B where
M is TREESAME to A. Hmm, that's effectively "git rev-list ." isn't it?

j.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]