Re: configuring cherry-pick to always use -x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder venit, vidit, dixit 15.02.2011 10:18:
> Michael J Gruber wrote:
> 
>> - If you do want them on the same branch "f-release", you probably know
>> beforehand which commits you don't want on master. You can fake-merge
>> these ("merge -Xours") to master and merge the others
> 
> For the record, I think that should be -sours.
> 
> I think it's just a typo but the difference is big --- -sours means
> "supersede by pretending to merge but actually keeping our version",
> while -Xours means "do a normal merge but be sloppy and favor our
> change when encountering adjacent or overlapping changes".

Yes, sorry and thanks.

-Xours may still be useful to know for the OP, but for the complete
fake-merge you need -sours. In fact, "-sours" has an awfully good
mnemonic when used for fake-merging commits which you do not want to
cherry-pick :)

Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]