On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:02, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> The amount of transfer being that small was something I didn't quite >>> expect, though. Doesn't it indicate that our pathname based object >>> clustering heuristics is not as effective as we hoped? >> >> I'm not sure I follow your question. > > I didn't see path information in your cachefile that contains C commits, T > trees, etc. that sped up the object enumeration, but you didn't observe > much transfer inflation over the stock git. I didn't store the path itself, I stored the path hash as a 4 byte int. Its smaller, but still helps to schedule the object into the right position in the delta search. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html