Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Using this for object enumeration shaves almost 1 minute off server > packing time; the clone dropped from 3m28s to 2m29s. That is close to > what I was getting with the cached pack idea, but the network transfer > stayed the small 376 MiB. I like this result. The amount of transfer being that small was something I didn't quite expect, though. Doesn't it indicate that our pathname based object clustering heuristics is not as effective as we hoped? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html